A clearer view of AI in schools.

A national principles-based framework supports responsible GenAI use, clear assessment instructions, human accountability, privacy and inclusion. State and local requirements still matter.

6 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Scenario-based guidance puts human judgment and learning purpose first. It neither uniformly prohibits nor mandates generative AI.

4 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Primary pupils learn about AI without direct GenAI use. Classroom use starts from 4e under teacher guidance; lycée autonomy stays within a teacher-defined learning framework.

7 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Schools choose classroom uses within safeguarding, data-protection, product-age and assessment requirements. Local discretion does not remove these duties.

5 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Schools set practical classroom rules, but assessed evidence must remain the learner’s own. GenAI is not permitted in NCEA external assessment; relevant authenticity policies must address acceptable use.

5 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

P1–3 receive no assignments requiring direct AI. P4–6 use education-specific tools under supervision. Proctored national exams prohibit AI; specifically permitted coursework has separate conditions.

6 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Pedagogical resources support critical, creative, ethical, inclusive, and safe AI integration. This is guidance rather than a national permission code.

4 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Living guidance supports planned, safe AI use while keeping teaching and final judgment human-led. Schools can review existing policies.

4 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

A Human–AI–Human approach keeps people at the beginning and end of AI use. State guidance supports local classroom implementation.

4 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

For 2026–27, student-facing GenAI is under a moratorium in grades 2K–8, with accessibility exceptions. High-school use is limited to approved programs; AI cannot grade or make student decisions.

6 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Government announced a staged approach: generally no pupil AI access in grades 1–7, cautious use in grades 8–10, and appropriate-use learning in upper secondary.

3 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Classroom choices are local, while GenAI is prohibited in written and oral Folkeskole examinations, including assessed preparation.

3 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

National guidance focuses on institutional governance, human responsibility, vendor controls and personal-data protection.

2 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

A presidential decree directs a 2026–29 AI plan, teacher development, student-data protection and standards for content, assessment and academic integrity.

2 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Provincial guidance and tools address ethical AI adoption and responsible GenAI teaching across preschool, primary, secondary and other education sectors.

1 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Provincial resources support human-centered K–12 AI use. Teachers make classroom choices based on student needs, with local procedures and policies.

2 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Hwb offers school GenAI guidance with explicit data-protection responsibilities. Learners’ personal information must not be entered into GenAI tools.

1 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

PaideIA promotes computational thinking, critical AI use and secondary-level AI development. The launch describes progressive implementation, not blanket classroom permission.

1 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

The ministry announced a GenAI guide for general education addressing students, teachers and parents, with responsible and ethical use as its focus.

0 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

An official education notice confirms v2.1 guidance for primary and secondary schools, with versions for students and for teachers, administrators and parents.

0 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Government reports a seven-ministry framework across formal, nonformal and informal education, emphasizing age, readiness and child development.

0 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

District-approved tools, an under-13 restriction, privacy controls and attribution requirements govern school-related AI use.

8 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Voluntary guidance combines human oversight, task-specific expectations, transparency, privacy and equitable access.

7 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Providers govern tools and data. Assessment decisions remain human; classroom expectations should be explicit.

8 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

AI use must preserve assessment integrity and individual competence. Course specifications and explicit acknowledgement matter.

6 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Teachers define assessment-specific AI criteria, teach responsible use, require disclosure and observe student processes.

6 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries

Requires at least eight AI-literacy class hours annually from autumn 2025, with teaching differentiated by school stage.

4 of 8 dimensions have source-supported summaries